Honeybees are badass

bees
In this slow motion dubstep video we discover why honeybees kick so much ass. From their ability to fly 6 miles to being the keepers of the worlds food supply freaking honeybees rock!

Dinner Church Place Coming to Bond Street

IMG_4302

Looks like Bond Street is going to get some type of new religious eatery. St. Lydia’s Dinner Church is building out a space on Bond between Union St and Sackett.

On St. Lydia’s Dinner Church website it states that their…

congregation is looking for an experience of the Holy that is strong enough to lean on, deep enough to question, and challenging enough to change us.

They have a video that explains what their religious gathering is like…

Graffiti: Union Street

We have totally posted an image of this huge mural before. It is a fictional illustration of the Gowanus Canal. (Unless giant mole rat looking thing has moved in and we somehow missed it.)

IMG_4308

What we didn’t notice was a little risky local commentary within the illustration. At around the middle of the mural you can find this…

IMG_4311At first glances you might think it’s trash or even pooh, of which both are seen in the Canal. But, that’s not what that is. It looks like the shape of a body wrapped in a sheet and chains. That’s right the artist decided to put in a dead body floating in the Gowanus Canal in a massive mural right next to the Canal itself. Pretty darn bold!

Permeable Pavement Helps Address Flooding

permeable pavement

OMG! Chicago’s Lawrence Fishery, a local seafood restaurant right on the South Brand Chicago River, had to redo their parking lot and in line with City requirements had to put in Permeable Pavement. This Permeable Pavement takes all the water that falls onto it and lets it soak through a pervious top layer into to a stone layer. Once at the stone layer the water is held temporarily, so that it can slowly move into the ground of the sewage system. This is like is exactly what Gowanus needs to help assist the combine sewage system, which is currently under repair.

Rain Ready Solutions in Action: Permeable Pavement from CNT on Vimeo.

For more info on permeable pavements and other flood prevention technologies go to: rainready.org

‘Take Back Gowanus’ Continues

Canal Ok, so we like to keep people informed and so have found ourselves on the email list of Take Back Gowanus. In this email (which we have been approved to make public), titled: Followup and Future: The Gowanus Preservation Society Meeting Review and Moving Forward, Joseph Alexiou, who led Take Back Gowanus, presented a document that had all the raw idea notes from the groups first meeting. At first we wanted to list them all, but it’s a really long list. So, you can find it here. This list is good to know, since we generalized this information in one of our previous postings and of course it shows that there are lots and lots and lots of issues that Gowanus residents have. Joseph goes on in the email to say the group may have another meeting soon, pending everyones schedule.

Also in the email were comments directed at City Council Member Brad Lander’s recent posting called Planning for the future of Gowanus discussing Bridging Gowanus and the issues raised at the separate Take Back Gowanus meeting. Joseph praises the Council Member, who was BCC on the email, but still feels like issues were left out of the process. With that stated, Joseph indicates in the email that he wants to be further involved in the Council Members framework report, which gathered data from a separate event called Bridging Gowanus. This whole thing can get a bit confusing, if one is not in the know. Here is the skinny… City Council Member Brad Lander had a series of public forums for Gowanus residents to discuss issues facing the community called Bridging Gowanus. Not surprisingly, some people in the community were less than pleased that all the concerns about development were not a focus of Bridging Gowanus. In particular Gowanus resident Joseph Alexiou was very vocal about the development concerns at the Bridging Gowanus meetings. So, these dissatisfied people had their own meeting, lead by Joseph Alexiou, called Take Back Gowanus. They came up with lots of issues (shown here) . Now an email from Joseph is requesting that he be involved with the Council Member Brad Lander’s framework report over the Bridging Gowanus meetings he and the others were originally displeased with.

Joseph also wonders if anyone else can be included in the framework report discussions. And here is where we at GYFO jump in with a little bit of opinion. We at GYFO would like to be a part of this framework report discussion. Not as press, but as people that have covered the neighborhood for a while and have just reported on issues in a ‘neutral’ sort of way. But here is where we see a problem with us jumping in; we are just one group out there of a very crowded community of groups and people with varying positions. Everyone would be a little confused as to why a single rep from Gowanus Alliance, Gowanus By Design, South Brooklyn Development Corporation, Take Back Gowanus, or anyone else would not be a part of the framework report discussion. Although, Joseph does represent multiple groups in the area, we are not sure how the community would feel if he gets in and others don’t. As you can tell from our request to jump in, GYFO would totally be jealous and we think we wouldn’t be alone. That being said maybe its a saparate meeting with Joseph on behalf Take Back Gowanus to hash out the bit City Council Member Brad Lander noted that he would put in to cover the groups issues.

So, is it enough for City Council Member Brad Lander to add in the concerns from Take Back Gowanus? Are more Bridging Gowanus  meetings (or similar with Gowanus movers & shakers) necessary? Or can Gowanus just see that all the issues may not be in this particular report… and thus more reports should be done? It looks like only City Council Member Lander will be able to decide.

Whole Foods New Souped-up Delivery Bikes

bikesolar2
Despite Whole Foods Gowanus store’s troubles with the 3rd Ave bike lane, it looks likes they may actually love bikes. They recently partnered with People’s Cargo to make custom built electric-assist cargo bikes that will be used to make local deliveries. The cargo bikes are anything but standard, as they look a bit smaller than normal cargo bikes (if cargo bikes are normal) – thus more maneuverable for the city streets, come with a cooler – to keep things fresh, and also have solar panel to help with charging.

bikesolar1

This bike is yet another step that Whole Food Gowanus has taken to help bolster their claim as the most sustainable super market in the U.S.. The Whole Food Gowanus store, if you didn’t know, rocks solar panels over the parking lot, unique windmills, and a rooftop green house. It’s a one of a kind store, in a one of a kind neighborhood.

Discovered via

Plastic Sucks So Much!

screengrab222This video maybe geared towards Europeans, but it applies to everyone on the planet. Plastic is killing everything in the ocean. Let us repeat. PLASTIC IS KILLING EVERYTHING IN THE OCEAN! It’s not a guess anymore, it’s is happening and we have to stop it.

Info on the film here: itsaplasticworld.com

TAKE BACK GOWANUS – A Homeowner’s Reaction

The tête–à–tête between Bridging Gowanus and Take Back Gowanus has brought to the fore a simmering debate about the future of the area around the fetid waterway. This is one homeowner’s observation.

A bit of background. I make my living as a urban design and transportation planner and am involved with Gowanus by Design. I supported and continue to support the Superfund cleanup. My family has lived in the area since 1993. We bought in 2000 and have undergone four renovations (as money allowed). After Irene we built a flood wall which kept Sandy at bay (except for the basement). We disconnected our rain gutters from the sewer system and built a drywell so that our stormwater does not run off into the canal. We have to get our homeowners insurance through Lloyd’s of London because no one else will cover us. Flood insurance essentially doubles our payments.

l1We live across the street from the Lightstone site but did not support it. We are not anti-development, but are opposed to developers with fleets of lawyers and special dispensations. The idea that high-rise housing should be built on a brownfield in a flood zone over former swamp where the bedrock is 90 feet below grade represents poor urban planning. There are plenty of better sites nearby on higher, cleaner ground closer to transit, shops and schools. My neighbors and I organized in late 2013 to protect ourselves from the Lightstone construction, including hiring our own engineer.

My read of the current situation is the Lightstone development has so antagonized the neighborhood that people are beginning to understand just what a decade or more of construction portends. There is nothing like the pounding of 1200 piles to focus the mind. To wit:

  • The Superfund designation scared off many speculative developers which created space for many properties to be locally and organically developed and small businesses to proliferate (Ample Hills, Bell House, Clairware Pottery, Crusader Candle, Foro Marble, Gowanus Industrial Arts Complex, Lavender Lake, Rooftop Films, Square Designs, The Green Building that CB6 rejected for conversion to residential a number of years ago). Lightstone has reminded everyone that giants lurk.
  • The City drags its heels and is almost obstructionist when it comes to the Superfund cleanup. They say it is too expensive, but clearly developers have funds to build 12 stories.
  • We hear promises of canal-side promenades with waterside access (to the publically-accessible waterway), yet the gate to the Whole Foods canal-side promenade is often locked and there are no access points for boaters.L2
  • We are not opposed to affordable housing, in fact encourage it; however, the affordable house as part of the Barclays center project is just now getting started after 10 years and a binding government directive.
  • Lightstone and their contractors have been secretive and unresponsive, even though they claimed they wanted to be good neighbors. They are well versed in the typical game of get it done before the complaints get too loud. They agreed to a non-binding good neighbor agreement with Community Board 6, but we’ve seen scant evidence that that was anything more than fluff.
  • We watched while asbestos in the existing building at the Lightstone site was removed by workers wearing nothing more than gloves and cheap face masks. We called 311 and they were made to wear hazmat suits.
  • My professional grade decibel monitor has recorded 100 dB when Lightstone is pounding piles about 100 feet away. The NYC noise code states the “quietest pile driving method shall be selected”; a noise barrier shall block the line of sight between the pile driver and any indoor receptor within 200 feet (my bedroom window); the maximum sound is to be 101 dB at 50 feet, and the maximum usage is 20% of total time. When we call DEP, they act like they’ve never heard this issue.
  • We call 311 when our house shakes during the Lightstone construction and the operator tells us that it’s our problem and we might be forcibly evacuated.
  • On some days the stench from the construction site is overwhelming, such that we call 911 thinking there is a gas leak. Government officials tell us everything is fine, but our noses tell us differently. Is the remediation kosher? Is anyone monitoring the site? According to official files there is benzene, ethylbenzene, n-propylbenzene, methyl tert butyl ether, toluene, and xylenes in the soil. Exposure causes everything from itchy eyes to leukemia.
  • Lightstone digs holes in Bond Street in the early morning hours, attaches pipes to the sewer, then quickly fills the hole. No permit is displayed from either DOT or DEP. Then water sewage seeps out of the sewer utility cover in front of my house and sewage gurgles out of our neighbors toilets.
  • We attend meetings with DOB and are told that many of the issues are out of their purview and we should visit DEP, DEC, DOT, etc.
  • Our local politicians do not respond (if at all) unless there is a petition, then take credit for any changes.
  • We are asked to envision the future – but the future is now and we don’t like what we see, hear, feel and smell.

L3I don’t begrudge Councilman Lander for the current state of affairs. I do not think he is in cahoots or incompetent. He has told me personally that we are all in this together, and I respect that. After all, he appears to be the only local politician to engage. I do think though that Lander has been blindsided by forces somewhat beyond his control.

The first was partially his doing. The Bridging Gowanus sessions were poorly run. I say that as a professional in the field. The second is that the city, especially 311, is ill-equipped to deal with situations like the Lightstone construction. The lack of coordination from government officials and anything remotely resembling action is astounding.

In response I propose the following:

  1. We need to devise a way for the City to proactively enforce its rules regarding noise, remediation and other construction activity. Relying on 311 calls is almost duplicitous. I propose an ombudsperson who would report to the Community Board or Public Advocate and be funded by developer fees. They could force the use of screw pile drivers and verify no toxic fumes are emitted from the site.
  2. We need an all-agency “no buck-passing” meeting with the city, state and federal government. The neighborhood has a right to straight answers.
  3. We cannot ever again accept non-binding agreements with developers. Either put it in writing and back it with bonds, or go away.
  4. As a condition of receiving a building permit, I would like for Lightstone to create a contingency fund for physical damages to neighboring buildings.

 

*This posting was submitted by Michael King a local Gowanus resident. If you have a different take or additional information regarding the issues noted in this posting, please comment or send an email to GowanusYourFaceOff@gmail.com.

 
 

(The images shown in this posting were done by a member of the GYFO Team.)

DEP explains Gowanus Canal Facilities Upgrades

flushing 2

The DEP, NYC’s Department of Environmental Protection, posted a video explaining the upgrades to the Gowanus Canal Flushing tunnel and the Gowanus Waste Water Pumping Station. As you may or may not know the Gowanus Canal Flushing tunnel is a twelve foot diameter, mile long tunnel, which after the upgrade will bring higher oxygenated water from the Buttermilk Channel to the top (dead end point) of the Gowanus Canal. The Gowanus Waste Water Pumping Station has been upgraded from moving 20 million gallons of water per day to moving 30 million gallons of stinky waste water per day away from the Canal. The upgrade project, which was suppose to cost $158 million, but ending up costing $177 million, is the key to improving the Gowanus Canal as well as a means for satisfying the requirements set forth by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency who declared the Canal a superfund site in 2010.